18: Back to the future

I can barely contain my excitement. The device works. I owe CF an enormous debt. The two coils need to be perfectly balanced, for obvious reasons. It seemed an insurmountable task until I received the post from Fowley. I'm not sure whether it's what he had in mind or not, but the solution was simple and elegant. For the coils to be perfectly balanced, what could be better than using the same coil at two different spatio-temporal locations. As you know, I had already has some success sending small objects back to locations in the past using a single coil. It was a simple matter to configure a coil, send it to the past, locate the coil and use the cloned coil in the apparatus.
Obviously, while in the past, I wrote and posted some messages on social media, and of course the now famous 'Post 17'. I took with me my mobile telephone with a copy of the post on it and simply cut and paste. I hate to think, I really hate to think, what would have happened if I had changed it.
But a peculiar question now arises. Who wrote  'Post 17'? I know I didn't. I simply read it, with obvious delight, and realised that at some point in the future I would be successful. But when I ventured into the past, I simply copied what I knew to have been written. There must be some strand of reality in which I wrote 'Post 17'.
Should anyone be brave, or is it foolhardy, enough to repeat my experiment, the precise details of the procedure for aligning and balancing the Josephson coils are available at the dark web address with the other documentation. I only wish I'd thought to post it there when I ventured back, as I could have... saved myself a lot of...time?

Post Scriptum:
For anyone with any interest in the subject, the Earman Unit, the development of which has taken up so much of my time, is completely unnecessary. The precise nature of the Cauchy Surface at T1 is a non-existent 'problem' which the Earman Unit was supposed to address. I will resist the temptation to scavenge the unit for parts. I'm sure it will be useful for something.